Monday, September 30, 2013

Eliza Lynch: the Paramour of Paraguay

Eliza Lynch in her younger years
In the modern-day city of Asuncion, Paraguay two main avenues, Avenida Madame Eliza A. Lynch and Avenida Mariscal Lopez intersect each other in the Estanzuela neighborhood. The junction of these two avenues is symbolic of the interaction of the lives of the two individuals after whom these main streets are named. These two people, an Irish woman from Cork and a Paraguayan man, the son of a dictator, came together in the mid-1800's and impacted the history of Paraguay with long-lasting and devastating consequences.


Elizabeth Alice Lynch was born in Charleville, Co. Cork on the 3rd of June 1835. Her parents were members of the Church of Ireland. Her father John Lynch was a medical doctor and her mother Jane Elizabeth the daughter of a Royal Navy captain. History records little about her early life, but by the time she was 16 the Lynch family was living in Paris and Elizabeth was already married to French army officer Xavier Quatrefages. Her husband's career took the couple to live for a time in Algiers but the marriage did not last. In 1853 she left her soldier-husband and returned to live with her mother in Paris.


Francisco Solano Lopez
Shortly thereafter in the city of love and lights “Eliza” met Francisco Solano Lopez, the playboy son of the then dictator of Paraguay, Carlos Antonio Solano. Francisco was in Europe on his father's behalf, visiting various capitals seeking support for his country and also buying up materiel, both industrial and military to advance and defend it. From the beginning Francisco and Eliza became smitten by love and from then on her life became the stuff of exotic fable. The fact that a number of novels, poems, short stories and a ballet were written and a film was made about her in later years make it difficult to separate fact from fiction about her life. In between Francisco's diplomatic and business forays, Eliza became pregnant. Solano returned home to Paraguay leaving Lynch with the means to follow him soon after. She arrived in Buenos Aires in October 1855 where she gave birth to their first son, Juan Francisco “Panchito” Lopez. From there she traveled on with her baby to Paraguay.


Lynch at about 20 years old
“La Lynch” as she became known in Paraguay, never married Solano but she went on to bear him six more children. For this, the elite of Asuncion, the capital, regarded her with disdain. In spite of their attitude, Lynch projected an aura of self-confidence and high culture. She had been schooled in the Parisian arts and now she was intent on bringing high style to Asuncion society. This created a tension between the bigotry of the already established high society ladies of Paraguay with their view of her as the mistress of the dictator's son and her own snobbish self-portrayal as an even higher society madame from Paris.


From her arrival in 1853 up to 1862, Eliza Lynch, the paramour of the dictator's son had significant influence on the nation's life. She imported teachers and lecturers, architects and musicians from Europe who popularized literature, theater, musical concerts and French cuisine. She promoted education for all, including for women, and advanced the field of medicine. And most of all she supported her man Solano Lopez.


In September 1862, upon his father's death, Francisco Solano Lopez became president of Paraguay. Now “Madame Lynch”, as she described herself, became unofficially the “First Lady” of the nation. Unfortunately, Solano let the power of his office go to his head or as some would say, he let his lady have undue influence over his decisions as head of state.


Because Paraguay is a landlocked country, its only access to the sea was down the Paraguay and Parana Rivers to the Rio de la Plata and into the Atlantic. Solano had expansionist dreams. His country would be landlocked no longer. He would extend his territory taking a swath through Brazil out to the Atlantic. To prepare for this he brought in foreign technicians to build railroad and telegraph lines and to expand his capacity to build armaments and warships for action on the nations rivers. In addition he sought to increase the number and strength of his army with mandatory military service and intensive training. Solano was preparing for war.


Some commentators on the history of the period attribute Solano's aggressive spirit to his partner Eliza Lynch. As devoted as she was to him, he also was to her. He transferred vast land holdings and other state teasures to her name at a time when he felt he could trust few people. They said that Lynch's self-confidence and unbending will inspired him to forge ahead with the plan to expand Paraguayan territory. Other commentators describe her as having a more humane spirit and that she remained loyal to her man as well as to her adopted country. Still others said that she was nothing more than the Irish consort of the dictator who pushed him to start a futile war with his neighbors. Ambition motivated them both to reach too far beyond their realistic capabilities. And it was becoming quite clear that Solano himself suffered paranoia to the point of having some of his friends and family members executed for even questioning his cause.


In November 1864 Solano declared war against Brazil which previously had taken over Uruguayan lands. So all at once he was at war with two countries. And when he crossed over into Argentinean territory in his attempt to carry the war further south, he found himself in a three way battle, the War of the Triple Alliance of Brazil, Uruguay and now Argentina. The war dragged on for five years decimating the Paraguayan population. Some commentators said that as many as 90% of Paraguayan males above the age of 7 died in the conflagration.


The end came for Solano himself at Cerro Cora on March 1, 1870. Both he and his 15 year old son were executed by Brazilian solders. As the story goes, Lynch buried their bodies with her bare hands in the sacred earth of that place. The country was left in complete ruins and Lynch was taken prisoner. Claiming British citizenship, she escaped the clutches of the cruel Brazilians by being deported to London with her surviving children.
Lynch's tomb in La Recoleta


After a five year absence Lynch returned to Paraguay in October 1875 to try to recuperate some of the properties and treasures that had been confiscated from her. This time she was regarded as persona non grata and failed in her attempt. Again she left her adopted country and returned to live out her life quietly in Paris where she died in July 1886 at the age of 51. She was buried in Pere Lachaise cemetery where her body remained for the next 75 years.


Ironically the lady who was in life the mistress to one Paraguayan dictator was rescued in death and had her reputation restored by another. In 1961, dictator General Alfredo Stroessner declared Eliza Lynch a Paraguayan national heroine and had her body exhumed from French soil and brought to repose in the national cemetery, La Recoleta, in Asuncion where she will lie in eternam.





In April 2013 a reception was held in Asuncion for a private screening of the new documentary film titled: Eliza Lynch – Queen of Paraguay. More than 1000 invited guests attended one of the city's largest social events of the year. Irish actress, Maria Doyle Kennedy, who played the part of Lynch, described her as “a courageous, controversial, contradictory, complicated woman … I was haunted by her. It was a remarkable life.” The film is based on the biographical account written by Michael Lillis and Ronan Fanning. In comments after the screenng, Lillis said that like Ireland, Paraguay “knows the problems of small countries having powerful neighbors”. The film will be premiering on October 11, 2013 at the BFI London film festival. Watch for it in your area.

Further reading:
The Lives of Eliza Lynch; Scandal and Courage by Michael Lillis and Ronan Fleming, 2009
The Shadows of Eliza Lynch: How a Nineteenth Century Courtesan Became the Most Powerful Woman In Paraguay by Sian Rees, 2003
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2003/05/04/the-eliza-lynch-story.html
http://www.irishargentine.org/0601_028to031.pdf
http://www.ucd.ie/news/2009/10OCT09/051009_eliza.html
http://www.historyireland.com/18th-19th-century-history/from-the-files-of-the-dib-paraguays-irish-national-heroine/

Friday, August 23, 2013

Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Man from Kerry

As we commemorate the 50th anniversary of perhaps the second most famous speech in American history on August 28, 1963   (Lincoln’s Gettysburg address is certainly the first), the man who gave the “I Have a Dream” speech, Martin Luther King, Jr. is being commemorated for his place in American history. One of the little known aspects of his life was his relationship with an Irishman, Michael J. Quill, the founder and president of the Transport Workers Union (TWU) in New York City.

In New York, from the 1930’s to the 1960’s, if you were Irish and worked for the subway system, you had two Gods: one was the Holy Trinity and the other was Mike Quill. Subway workers who operated the mass transit system in the early 1930’s earned an average of fifty cents an hour working a twelve hour day for six days a week. There was no vacation, no sick time, no medical, no benefits of any kind.

Mike Quill in 1935
Mike Quill was a big burly Kerryman from Kilgarvin who fled Ireland for his IRA activities arriving in New York in 1926. He started out as a ticket agent (change maker when a subway ride cost just five cents) at one of the subway stations. It didn't take long for him to understand that his fellow-workers were an underclass while the bosses were all much better off. He had no patience for injustice and soon hatched a plan to organize the workers. He had a jovial temperament and could be very charming but he also had one hell of a temper. Add to that he had a thick Irish brogue and a booming, slightly high-pitched voice, and he knew how to use both to rouse a crowd. By the mid-1930’s the labor movement was picking up great steam in America and Quill’s plan to unionize the subway workers fit right in with the rise of the labor movement. By 1934, with the aid of his friends and co-workers from Clan na Gael, the IRA surrogate in New York, the union was founded. In 1935 he became its first president and remained in that office until he died in 1966. 

In 1937 the TWU became a player on a bigger stage by becoming a member of the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO). Meanwhile the recruitment of the workers in New York continued with the amalgamation of the three subway systems, the original Interborough Rapid Transit (IRT), the Brooklyn Manhattan Transit (BMT) and the newly constructed Independent Subway (the IND). By the end of the 1940’s, the union had 45,000 members and Quill had become head of the New York section of the CIO. In 1950 he was elected one of its national vice presidents. By this time the TWU had extended beyond New York to represent the transit systems in Philadelphia, Chicago and Miami. Mike Quill had become one of the leaders of the American labor movement.

From its beginning in 1934, the Transport Workers Union under the leadership of Mike Quill fought for equal rights for all workers. Its constitution clearly frames its purpose:

The object of this organization shall be to unite in this industrial union, regardless of race, creed, color or nationality all workers eligible for membership employed in, on or about all passenger and other transportation facilities, public utilities and allied industries in the United States, Canada, and possessions and territories of the United States.

Quill’s zeal in organizing the underclass of subway workers in New York stemmed from his
TWU headquarters at 50th St. & B'way
passion for justice for all workers including black workers. In 1937, in collaboration with the 
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) he fought to get a number of black station porters promoted to station agents despite the vociferous opposition of management and even some of his own Irish union members. In 1941 the TWU led a Harlem bus boycott forcing the Fifth Avenue Bus Company to hire black drivers and mechanics. During these same years the TWU was involved in a face-off in Philadelphia with a rival union which refused to accept the TWU campaign to promote black workers. The rivals staged a wildcat strike necessitating the intervention of federal troops ordered by President Roosevelt. Once the strike was put down the TWU was enabled to force the Philadelphia Transportation Corporation to completely integrate its workers. And a few years later, in its contract negotiations with the Pennsylvania Railroad, the union got management to eliminate the term “colored” that was stamped on the travel passes issued to black workers. In Houston in 1962, the TWU negotiated with the Pioneer Bus Company to eliminate the segregated sections that both the company and a rival union had previously put in place. The TWU won overwhelming support from members in its first contract with the company to eliminate forever the “Jim Crow” hiring and employment policies that had been the practice.

In the late 1950’s Mike Quill began to take notice of a young black Baptist minister named
TWU Vice Pres. Matthew Guinan
conferring with MLK
Martin Luther King, Jr. who was eloquently speaking out for civil rights for black people in America. Quill had been an advocate for blacks in the transit industry since the founding of his union, and he saw a strong link between what he himself had been advocating and what this young minister was preaching in regard to civil rights for all people. The TWU began supporting King and his Southern Christian Leadership Conference by sending union member delegations to events sponsored by King. And Quill himself signed on as a vice-chairman of King’s Youth March for Integrated Schools in 1959.

In early 1961, twenty-five TWU members, airline workers from Tennessee wrote to Quill objecting to the union’s support of Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Freedom Riders. The Freedom Riders were mixed racial groups who traveled on buses from the North into the South. These
Union buses ready to go
rides had as their purpose
to challenge the status quo which obligated black people to sit in the rear on buses in the South. The Tennessee unionists told Quill that he ought not to be interested in these social issues and dedicate himself more fully to just union matters.
Quill responded to his Tennessee members’ letter in a fiery manner:

You have a lot to learn…. Wherever there are ignorant racist Klu Kluxers --- trying to destroy our country, it is the business of TWU. Wherever Americans do not have the right to vote, it comes under the heading of “things of the union” … When America is sick and endangered by the cancer of segregation, it is cause for concern by all organized labor --- and by each and every member of TWU.

A month after his letter of response to the Tennessee TWU contingent, Quill decided to invite Martin Luther King,  Jr. to address the upcoming TWU convention scheduled for April that year to dramatize the union’s
Mike Quill welcoming MLK
commitment to civil rights. King graciously accepted the invitation.  Quill introduced King’s speech with the following words:

I don’t think any leader since Abraham Lincoln has done as much to unite the American people, black and white, as Dr. King has done in the last fifteen years… Dr. King has tried a new approach to uniting the people of America. He does not advocate a separate Negro Republic. He does not favor arming the Negroes of the South against the white people. His tactics are very similar to the tactics we use in the trade union movement: the sit-down strike, the outright strike, the boycott.

To the applause of those assembled, King came to the podium and addressed the delegates. Here are some excerpts from his speech:


  • I bring greetings to you from the South, a section of our nation in transition. Mr. Quill has mentioned to you the struggle which took place in Montgomery, Alabama, and I can hardly speak on any platform in America without bringing greetings from the citizens of Montgomery, particularly the 50,000 Negro citizens … who came to see that it is ultimately more honorable to walk in dignity than ride in humiliation.
  • When your Union was born in strife during the turbulent thirties, it grew and developed in the pioneering, democratic tradition of a CIO union with respect to racial equality. Your crusading spirit which broke through the open shop stronghold, also broke through the double walled citadels of race prejudice.
  • Suffice it to say we will not rest until segregation and discrimination have been removed from every area of American life. We are convinced that segregation is a cancer in the body politic, which must be removed before our democratic health can be realized, and it is nothing but a new form of slavery, covered up with certain niceties of complexity.
  • …we will continue to work in areas of non-violent direct action to break down all of the barriers of segregation. We will continue to sit in, to stand in, to wade in, and to kneel in, in order to get America out of the dilemma in which she finds herself, as a result of the continued existence of segregation and discrimination.
  • Modern psychology has a word that is probably used more than any other word in modern environment. It is the word “maladjustment.”… I say to you today that there are some things in our social order toward which I am glad to be “maladjusted” and I call upon you to be “maladjusted.”


  • I never intend to adjust myself to slavery and segregation.
    I never intend to adjust myself to religious bigotry.
    I never intend to become adjusted to economic conditions that will take necessities from the many to give luxuries to the few.
    I never intend to become adjusted to the madness of militarism for … it is no longer a choice between violence and non-violence. It is now non-violence or non-existence.
    And I never intend to adjust to the madness of militarism and the self-defeating effects of physical violence.

    After the speech Quill presented Martin Luther King, Jr. with a check for $10,000 in further support of the struggle for civil rights. Days later in a letter of thanks, King wrote: “You and the members of your Union have proved to be real and abiding friends of those of us who are struggling for freedom and dignity in the Southland.”

    On January 1, 1966, after weeks of fruitless negotiations with the New York City Transit Authority and city officials, the Transport Workers Union called the first subway strike in its history. For 12 days the city ground to a halt. No public transportation moved. A court injunction was issued against the strike and Mike Quill and the top TWU officials were jailed and a second team of negotiators stepped into their place. Quill, who had a previous heart attack, collapsed in jail and was taken to Bellevue Hospital. Ultimately the strike was settled and Quill came back to a thunderous reception from his union members at the Americana Hotel. The new contract contained the largest wage and benefits package in the union's history. But the stress was just too much and two weeks later Mike Quill died at home of a heart attack. Among all the tributes that were received by his wife and family was one from Martin Luther King, Jr. It said:

    Mike Quill was a fighter for decent things all his life – Irish Independence, labor organization and racial equality. He spent his life ripping the chains of bondage off his fellow man. This is a man the ages will remember.





    I believe in the Corporal Works of Mercy, the Ten Commandments, the American Declaration of Independence and James Connolly’s outline of a socialist society … Most of my life I’ve been called a lunatic because I believe that I am my brother’s keeper. I organize poor and exploited workers, I fight for the civil rights of minorities, and I believe in peace. It appears to have become old-fashioned to make social commitments – to want a world free of war, poverty and disease. This is my religion. 
                                                                                                 Michael J. Quill


    Further Reading:

    Mike Quill: Himself  by Shirley Quill
    The Man Who Ran the Subways: The Story of Mike Quill  by L.H. Wittemore
    In Transit  by Joshua B. Freeman
    The Fight for Civil Rights and the Role of Labor
    Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Global Freedom Struggle
    TWU Fights for Civil Rights
    Fenian Graves

    Saturday, May 5, 2012

    Father Anthony Dominic Fahy, Irish Chaplain of Argentina

    Father Fahy's tomb

    As you enter the main gate of the Recoleta Cemetery in Buenos Aires, continue walking straight in and on the right side perhaps within 100 yards, you will find a monument, the burial place of Almirante Guillermo (Admiral William) Brown, the Irishman who is considered to be the Father of the Argentine navy. On the left side, a bit further in, you will find an ornate monument with an angel facing forward and holding a plaque in his hands that simply says “Father Fahy”. This is the burial place of Father Anthony Dominic Fahy, OP, the most famous Irishman in nineteenth century Argentina.

    Anthony Fahy (or Fahey as he himself preferred, but it never stuck) was born in Louchrea, Co. Galway on January 11, 1805. His parents, Patrick Fahy and Belinda Cloran were proprietors of a brewery in the town. They had seven children before Patrick passed away. Belinda subsequently married a cousin of her first husband also surnamed Fahy in 1816 and they had 3 children. Of Belinda's ten children, five went into the priesthood or religious life. At age 22 Anthony entered the Dominican Order and did his novitiate year in Athenry, pronouncing his first vows in August 1829. Then he went on to Rome for his philosophy and theology studies. He was ordained a priest in Rome at the Basilica of St. John Lateran on March 19, 1831. For the next three years he remained in Rome advancing his studies.

    In 1834 he was missioned to St. Joseph's in Somerset, Ohio, which was then a backwoods kind of place where the priests had to travel long distances on horseback to reach their flocks. Father Anthony lasted only two years in Ohio, when in1836, because of “broken health” he returned to Ireland to recuperate. After a two year hiatus, he requested to be sent back to Ohio but his request was denied. Instead he ministered in a parish in Galway for the next three years. In 1839 he was appointed Prior of the Dominican community of Black Abbey in Kilkenny.

    Beginning in the 1820's the Archbishop of Dublin, Daniel Murray, was responsible for sending a priest to minister to the spiritual needs of the growing Irish immigrant community in Argentina. In 1843 this chaplaincy had been vacated but the archbishop didn't have a priest to spare so he requested the bishop of Ossory, William Kinsela, to look for a replacement. Kinsela knew Anthony Fahy and remembering his desire to return to the missions in America, offered him the opportunity in Argentina and he readily accepted. Father Anthony Fahy sailed into Buenos Aires harbor on January 11,1844, his 39th birthday.

    At the time of Fahy's arrival in Argentina there were an estimated 3500 Irish people living in Buenos Aires. He took up residence at the Santo Domingo convent and started celebrating Mass at the church of San Ignacio where his predecessor, Father Patrick O' Gorman had made arrangements to have the Irish community gather weekly. Later he relocated the community to the Franciscan chapel of San Roque where there were benches, pulpit, confessional and organ. He also moved into another home given to him rent-free through the generosity of Thomas Armstrong, a wealthy Westmeath-born Protestant who arrived in Buenos Aires in 1817.

    Father Fahy's activities on behalf of the Irish community quickly became all encompassing. He made himself available to assist his people in every human capacity, as financial adviser, marriage counselor, judge, interpreter, employment agent and especially as matchmaker. When he saw that there were not enough marriageable women in the Irish community, he wrote back to Ireland and arranged for a large number of young ladies from his own Loughrea area to emigrate to Argentina.

    Father Fahy with top hat
    As time progressed Father Fahy achieved numerous accomplishments. In 1847 he launched the Irish Relief Fund to aid famine victims in Ireland which was then in the throes of the great famine. He collected and sent 411 Irish punts to the Archbishop of Dublin. In 1848 he opened the Irish Immigrant Infirmary to assist sick newcomers. So many new arrivals were coming off the transatlantic ships overwhelmed by fatigue, malnourishment, and other ailments from the long journey that he saw this as a necessary response.


    In the same letter that Fahy wrote to the Archbishop of Dublin with the famine relief funds, he also strongly encouraged that more Irish people consider immigrating to Argentina. He wrote:

    "May God bring Irish immigrants to this country instead of going to the United States. Here they will feel at home, will have plenty of work and experience the friendliness of the local people; very different from what they are experiencing in the U.S. Which forces them back to Ireland. There is no better country in the world to come especially with a poor family. The vast plains lying idle, eager for hands that want to cultivate. The government offers all kinds of protection and encourages people from abroad."

    Fahy also encouraged the poorer laborers who remained living and working in the city of Buenos Aires to consider moving out into the pampas. On his trips to the countryside, he saw that the folks out there were better off than those in the city. He encouraged these city folks to save some money and invest in land and to raise sheep in the countryside. He often even accompanied them on their first visit to the bank to open savings accounts so that they might achieve their goals.

    By 1848 it was evident that Fahy was achieving great success in his ministry and outreach to the Irish community of Argentina. He made it his business to know all the right people in high places so that when necessary he could use these contacts to aid the members of the Irish community. However, two matters arose which cast long shadows over his influence and his role in Irish-Argentine society.

    Camila O' Gorman
    The first had to do with a young lady, Camila O' Gorman, a twenty year old from a very well-to-do family who fell in love with a young priest, Ladislao Gutierrez, and became pregnant. The two eloped and traveled north intending to cross into Bolivia or Brazil. Because the president, Juan Manuel de Rosas, a ruthless dictator by this time, saw their actions as an affront to his campaign to uphold his code of morality and honor, he put out the alarm for their capture. They assumed new names and tried to remain hidden. After a time when things had cooled and the alarm was called off because the authorities thought that they had escaped, they set themselves up as teachers in a remote town still in Argentine territory where they were favorably received. At a party in their honor they were recognized by another priest who turned them in. After a short imprisonment, Rosas the dictator, ordered them to be executed. They had no trial and no opportunity to present testimony. Rosas consulted Father Fahy about the matter and Fahy concurred that such actions warranted “exemplary punishment” for “the priest who had sullied his church and the wayward girl who not only lead a priest astray but also gave the industrious and well regarded Irish-Argentine community a bad name!”

    Camila O' Gorman, eight months pregnant, and Ladislao Gutierrez, the priest, tied to chairs side-by-side were executed by a firing squad in August 1848. Many people were horrified and repulsed by this barbaric act so much so that the dictator never really recovered from this horrific event and four years later fled for his own life to England where he died in poverty.

    Juan Manuel de Rosas
    The second matter also had to do with the dictator, Juan Manuel de Rosas. By 1849 the world-at-large had become aware of the ruthless and bloodthirsty tyrant who with his iron fist was ruling Argentina. An article in the Dublin Review accused Rosas of great cruelty and unbelievably Fahy wrote a rebuttal in La Gaceta Mercantil (Rosas' official government paper) saying:

    “All that is stated in the libel inserted in the Dublin Review in regard to supposed crimes and assassinations of a Mazhorca Society in the service of the police, which are fancied in that production as proved at former periods; all that is said of the profanation of churches and sanctuaries and the other suppositions of this stamp … are but a tissue of contemptible falsehoods.”

    Needless to say, Fahy's rebuttal to the Dublin Review article was very well received by Rosas. It was published in two different editions in one week. Then a few days later a special edition was published with the Fahy response and several editorial comments all in Spanish, English and French for world-wide consumption. Fahy had endeared himself to the regime but he must have left many people wondering why he chose to defend Rosas. A man of the gospel condoning the policies and actions of a tyrannical dictator left many people in this Catholic society wondering what was really in Fahy's mind.

    But somehow Father Fahy escaped the recriminations of his flock. While they feared and felt only contempt for Juan Manuel de Rosas, Fahy continued to gain the admiration of his people because of his total dedication to their every human need.

    In 1854 Father Fahy sent a sizeable sum of money to All Hallows college in Dublin to educate six young priests for the mission in Argentina. He was concerned about the quality of Argentine priests and wanted his priests to be trained in the classical Irish tradition. Of the non-Irish priests he said that they were “adventurers from Europe whose ambition is to make money and often give more scandal to religion than edification.”

    Fahy's six new Irish priests began to arrive in 1860. At first he had them stay in his house while they were adjusting to their new environment and learning Spanish. After this orientation period Fahy sent them out to the various areas where the Irish community lived.

    At Fahy's behest eight Sisters of Mercy of Baggot Street, Dublin, arrived to a great welcome in February 1856. They were to work in the Irish Immigrant Infirmary. In time the infirmary became transformed into the educational institution called St. Bridget's College. The sisters also opened a girls home, another college, Mater Misericordiae Academy and three more schools in regional towns.

    Sometime around 1860, Fahy's outlook began to turn pessimistic on the conditions for the further immigration to Argentina. In a letter back to Ireland he stated that “this is a most unfortunate country … The liberty, or rather unbridled license of the press has corrupted the people dreadfully, and the influx of the dregs of Spain and Italy has added considerably to the immorality of the nation.”

    Writing to the Prefect of the Sacred Congregation of the Propaganda in Rome in 1861, Fahy said “having resided in this Province for the space of seventeen years, I am able to form a sufficient idea of the wants of the Churches in this Country and the only remedy for its innumerable evils.” He said that Argentines had no real interest in the Church and blamed this on “the philosophy of the last age and all the bad books of France.”

    What was happening was that the immigrants of the earlier era who came and worked hard to save some money, then went out to buy or rent large tracts of land to raise sheep. Once all the cheap land was bought up, the more recent newcomers who came without capital to invest, could only find work as laborers on the farms or in the cities and seemed to have little hope of upward advancement. More recently arrived immigrants were having a tougher time than the earlier ones. This Fahy reflected in his statements such as:

    “The Irish are being elbowed out by the Italians. Our people have given themselves entirely to sheep-farming which until recently has been quite profitable as well as easy. But the best land for grazing is also the best land for tillage, and the Italian comes and offers a higher rent for the land, and so ousts the sheep farmer.”

    This is the same cycle that occurred in the American West. Once all the land was claimed, there was no more to buy and to gain wealth from. And so less supply means higher re-sale and rental prices for the land. Add to that the always present difficulty for the newly arrived Irishman to have to learn a new language in this new land. The Italian could pick up the Spanish language more easily and so had less of a disadvantage. And if he came with some financial resources, he was much better off than the Irish immigrant who was coming with nothing from a country just recuperating from the Great Famine.

    In Memory of the Victims of the 1871 Yellow Fever Epidemic
    By 1870 - 1871 the yellow fever epidemic was rampant in Buenos Aires. More than 13,600 people died. Father Fahy was busy ministering to the sick and the dying. When he himself passed away on February 20, 1871, the newspapers reported that he died of yellow fever after ministering to a sick Italian woman. However his death certificate clearly states that “ … he died from heart disease.” His remains were initially entombed in the vault of the diocesan clergy in Recoleta cemetery but later removed to the monument built by Earley sculptors of Dublin.

    Wednesday, April 25, 2012

    The Healy's: An Extraordinary Family



    How many families have you met in which there were nine children, of which three became priests (one a bishop) and three became nuns? And another son became a renowned ship captain guarding the coasts of American territory in Alaska. Must have been an Irish family. Right? And how about if the father was Irish born and the mother a mulatto slave? Never heard of such a thing, you'd say. Well, meet the Healy family of Georgia.

    Michael Morris Healy immigrated to the US from County Roscommon, Ireland in 1818. Within a few short years he became the owner of 1,500 acres of fertile land near Macon, Georgia. He also accumulated 49 slaves to farm the cotton from his plantation. Among them was one, Mary Eliza Clark (sometimes referred to as Smith). She was to become his common-law wife and the mother of his nine children. In Georgia at that time, marriage between whites and blacks was not only illegal but any children of such a union would be considered to be slaves. So mother and children of the Healy family were all legally slaves. This presented a danger and a dilemma to Michael Healy. In such a society the children could not be educated in white-only schools and there were no schools for slave children. So Michael designed a plan to send all his children to the North where slavery did not exist and where they could get a quality education.

    Bishop James A. Healy
    James Healy was only seven years old in 1837 when his father took him north to a Quaker school in Flushing, New York. He and his brothers, Hugh and Patrick, remained there a year or two and later transferred to another Quaker school in Burlington, New Jersey. A chance meeting between the elder, Michael Healy and Catholic Bishop John Bernard Fitzpatrick on board a ship traveling from New York to Boston, was to change the direction and the fate of the Healy children for the rest of their lives. Healy told the bishop about his family and Bishop Fitzpatrick recommended that the Healy boys be enrolled in the newly founded College of the Holy Cross run by the Jesuits in Worcester, Massachusetts. This college initially offered even elementary school grades and so in 1844, James 14, Hugh 12, Patrick 10, and Sherwood 8,  went to Massachusetts where they were baptized by the Jesuits of Holy Cross and began their studies at the college. Young Michael Healy followed his brothers to Holy Cross in 1849.

    The four eldest Healy boys were high academic achievers. In 1849 James was the valedictorian of the first graduating class at Holy Cross. He ranked academically at the top of his class and Hugh came out fourth. Patrick ranked first in his class and Sherwood was second in his. The fact that the boys did so well in their studies undoubtedly compensated in some way for the fact that they were mixed-race children in an all-white society. Also their sponsorship by Bishop Fitzpatrick, who was by now head of the Boston diocese, went a long way toward gaining acceptance for them in what could be a clearly intolerant society. Others around them could fairly easily discern that they had Negro blood. In most of them it was evident to a greater or lesser degree. But Bishop Fitzpatrick saw their potential and he began grooming them for a higher calling.

    In May 1850, their mother Eliza died unexpectedly. And their father Michael died only four months later. There were still three minor children at home so their brother Hugh, only 18 years old, traveled to Georgia (they were still all considered slaves and could have been picked up as runaways) and clandestinely brought his siblings north to safety in Boston.

    James expressed interest in becoming a priest so Bishop Fitzpatrick sent him to seminaries in Montreal and Paris. In 1854, James Healy was ordained in the Cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris, France. On his return the bishop now faced a dilemma: whether to place him in a position where he would be highly visible and possibly rejected because of his race, or to send him to an obscure location where he might be less visible. Bishop Fitzpatrick took a bold step making Healy his own secretary and chancellor of the diocese. And because of Healy's great interest in and compassion for the poor and the immigrant, of which the vast majority of Catholic Boston was, he was positively received by most people. In 1866 James Healy became pastor of S. James' Church, then the largest parish in Boston. At St. James he was known to often visit the homes of poor Irish immigrants with baskets of food.
    Bishop James Healy gravesite
    In 1875 he was ordained bishop of the diocese of Portland, Maine, which at that time covered the territory of Maine and New Hampshire. Prior to his ordination, a priest of that diocese wrote to the Vatican complaining that the people would never accept a mulatto to be their bishop. The writer never received a response.


    Bishop Healy headed the Portland, Maine diocese for 25 years. Under his leadership the diocese expanded greatly, opening 60 new churches, 68 missions and 18 convents and schools. He celebrated his Silver Jubilee as bishop on June 29, 1900 and five weeks later he died. As he had requested, he was buried not in a bishops vault, but in a simple coffin in Calvary Cemetery. A Celtic cross, placed by his own parishioners, marks his grave.

    Hugh Healy was the second eldest son. Although he too did very well at Holy Cross, he was not interested in the priesthood as was his brother James. He had a more entrepreneurial spirit. He was working in the hardware business when he was involved in boating accident. A resulting infection was the cause of his death at the young age of just 21 years. While we don't know a lot about him, we can speculate that he truly had a daring spirit to have gone to Georgia to rescue his two little sisters and brother after their parents deaths. The fact that they were still all legally slaves and would be at great risk on the journey back north, and that he himself was only 18 years old, is almost beyond imagination. How he brought them or arranged to have them transported north is something that history has not recorded. 

    Patrick Healy, SJ
    Patrick Healy was the next in line. From all reports he had almost no discernible features from his mother's mulatto heritage. But he knew who he was and always carried a certain sensitivity within himself. He was received into the Jesuit order and after two years he was sent back to Holy Cross in Worcester for his internship to teach. Because the students knew who his brothers were, they passed racially insensitive remarks at times “which wound my very heart” he wrote to Fr. Fenwick, an old mentor.

    Patrick progressed and went on to study at Louvain in Belgium where he earned his doctorate degree. He was ordained a priest in September 1866 and returned to the US to teach at Georgetown University. The Jesuits were concerned that because of his racial background he might not be accepted by the general student body comprised of many southerners. For that reason, at first he was assigned to teaching just Jesuit scholastics. After a year or two he became a philosophy professor teaching the general student population and in 1874, at 39 years of age, he was named the 29th president of Georgetown University.

    In spite of his great talents and accomplishments, Patrick still sometimes experienced offensive moments because of his racial background from those who knew who he was. In his role as university president he traveled extensively often staying in Jesuit houses. Once an old Jesuit remarked that some houses would not welcome him because no one would be willing to sleep again in the bed he had occupied. On the other side of the coin, showing his real accomplishments, on another occasion a student, the son of a Confederate general, not recognizing Patrick's racial background, said of him that he was “a finished scholar, a remarkable linguist, and the clearest thinker and expounder of his thoughts that I have ever met.”

    Fr. Sherwood Healy
    Alexander Sherwood Healy (always called Sherwood) was the fourth son. Bishop Fitzpatrick was certainly a strong advocate for the Healy brothers. But when the time came to advocate for Sherwood, the bishop saw it more difficult because of his more pronounced Negro features and because of the anti-Negro sentiment that was growing in Boston society. Like his brother James, Sherwood studied at the seminaries in Montreal and Paris and was ordained in Notre Dame in 1858. But when the time came for his return to the US, Bishop Fitzpatrick sensed Sherwood's reticence. The debate over slavery in the US was reaching a crescendo just prior to the outbreak of the Civil War. “He feels an unwillingness for reasons which I cannot condemn, to return to this country” Fitzpatrick told a papal official. And so Sherwood to went to Rome for advanced studies. A year later there was an opening for the position of rector of the new North American College in Rome, and again Fitzpatrick hesitated, writing in a letter that it was “useless to recommend him” because “he has African blood and it shows distinctly in his exterior” fearing that because of his race, the seminary students might not respect him. Had Bishop Fitzpatrick not hesitated, Sherwood might have become the first rector of the North American College in Rome. Instead Sherwood returned to the US with his doctorate degree in Canon Law and an expertise in Gregorian chant.

    In his early years back in Boston, Sherwood was chaplain to the Angel Guardian home and worked with his brother James who was chancellor of the Boston diocese. His expertise in church law and church music certainly came into play in this assignment. By 1870 he had been appointed rector of the new cathedral of the Holy Cross which was still under construction. Later he was appointed professor of Moral Theology and director of student discipline at St. Joseph's Provincial Seminary in Troy, New York. Sherwood's career in the priesthood was cut short by his death in 1875 at the age of 39 years.

    Captain Michael A. Healy
    Michael Healy was the rebellious brother. In 1849 he was enrolled at Holy Cross in Worcester like his brothers before him. But it became evident early on that the studious life didn't suit him. In 1854 he was sent off to the seminary in France but lasted only a short time there. He ran away to England and became a merchant seaman. The seafarers life seemed to be a better fit. He continued working on the ships until he returned to the US in 1863 with the intention of joining the Revenue Cutter Service, the predecessor of today's US Coast Guard. Because of his seafaring experience, a year later he became a commissioned officer (his commission was signed by President Abraham Lincoln) and was soon given command of a ship patrolling the waters around the newly acquired Alaskan territory.

    Because Michael's complexion did not reveal his mother's mulatto heritage, he easily passed for white. In 1865 he married Mary Jane Roach, the daughter of Irish immigrants, and they had one son. He was accepted into white society apparently as an Irish-American with no hint of his African bloodline. According to Boston College professor, James M. O'Toole, Michael Healy had so conscientized himself as white that he referred to white settlers in Alaska as “our people”. This same identity was apparently passed on to his son who while accompanying his father on an Alaskan patrol in 1883, scratched his name onto a rock on an island off the coast. He wrote into his diary that he was the first “white boy” to do so.

    Michael Healy's wild side never left him even in the Revenue Cutter Service. He had a reputation as a highly skilled seaman and had a knack for contending with the wild people and the even wilder weather of what was then the still unexplored Alaskan coast. He engineered several successful Arctic whaling ship rescues in the most challenging weather conditions. Ice was one of the most treacherous factors that a ship captain had to face in these waters and Healy became adept at dealing with it. In addition, effectively dealing with some of the most unsavory characters in a part of the world as yet somewhat uncivilized, “Hell-Roaring Mike” as he was known, became the symbol of law and order to his men on the ships and to the population on land. Once in a heated shipboard altercation, a crewman to whom he laid down the law, threw the worst epithet he could at him saying that he was “a God-damned Irishman”.

    It was because of his stern and often severe approach that he was once court-marshaled for cruelty to his crew. He was acquitted of this charge but later in 1895 again he was court-marshaled, this time for drunkenness, for gross irresponsibility and “scandalous conduct.” Sidelined for a while, Healy returned to service again as a captain after the Alaskan gold rush. He retired in 1903 and died a year later.

    In January 2012 when the Alaskan town of Nome on the Bering Strait was running low on fuel oil because of an early ice floe blocking the coast, the US Coast Guard Cutter Michael A. Healy opened the way through 300 miles of packed ice up to five feet deep for a Russian tanker to deliver the needed oil to the town. The legacy of Hell-Roaring Mike still lives!

    US Coast Guard Cutter Healy (left) opening the way for Russian tanker Renda

    Of the remaining four Healy children, three girls and one boy, we know much less than about the older boys. The girls were said to look more like their mother but there are no surviving photographs to verify that. On the recommendation of Bishop Fitzpatrick, the three girls went to school at the Congregation of Notre Dame convent in Montreal. And after they graduated all three wanted to be nuns.

    Martha was the oldest and she entered the Congregation of Notre Dame in 1851. She stayed only a short while and left religious life to return to Boston. She eventually married Jeremiah Cashman, an upwardly mobile Irishman.

    Amanda Josephine joined the Religious Hospitallers of Saint Joseph in Canada. She died at the young age of 39 years.

    Like her older sister Martha, Eliza Dunamore joined the Congregation of Notre Dame in Montreal. Known as Sister Mary Magdalene, she taught for a number of years in Quebec and Ontario. In 1903 she was appointed Superior of the Villa Barlow convent and school in St. Albans, Vermont. This was a school for the daughters of the New England upper crust society. As headmistress she pulled the school out of debt and reorganized the faculty and curriculum. After 15 years there, Sister Mary Magdalene was transferred to the College of Notre Dame in Staten Island, New York again as community superior. She died there in 1918 from cancer.

    All that is known about Eugene, the youngest Healy child, was that he did not have success in life. Never really establishing himself, he went from one job to another and occasionally landed in jail.


    A Postscript

    Reading through the material on the history of the Healy family, it is to be noted that while they surely knew of their African American roots, they all lived and worked in a basically all-white society. None of them ever expressed interest in the plight of the African slave in the 19th century United States. And interestingly too, while they undoubtedly knew of their father's Irish heritage, they didn't overtly identify with being Irish either. They immersed themselves completely into the society to which fate had delivered them, even with their personal hesitancy and fears. Several suffered the injury of insults because of their racial background, but none of them ever seemed to fight back. I am sure that many reasons may be put forth to explain why this happened, but because we can never know what they felt and thought on the inside, the explanation for their outward behaviors in this context will remain a mystery.

    In his book, Passing for White: Race, Religion and the Healy Family, 1820-1920, Professor James M. O'Toole points out that while Eliza Healy and her children were legally classified as slaves, they were never treated as such. Of course they had to be careful not to cross swords with the legal authorities who could make trouble for them because of their status. But the fact that Michael Healy thought of Eliza as his “trusty woman …. the mother of my children” and that he lived with her as a husband with his wife, and that he cared for the welfare of his children and their education, made a great difference. In addition, the fact that he had the financial means to do so, also greatly enhanced their chances for a better life.

    According to O'Toole, the Healy children became white at a time when racial issues were reaching an all-time high in the ante-bellum years. And they were able to do so not only because their skin complexions were not very dark, but because they had the support and patronage of Bishop Fitzpatrick and the Holy Cross Jesuits. The church itself had not been a bastion of anti-slavery up to that point. In fact the views and practices of many church communities were very pro-slavery. But thanks to the particular church people they met and who interceded for them, and also because of their own intelligence which was recognized by the church, they were able to pass for white.

    Saturday, April 7, 2012

    Ernesto "Che" Guevara, Grandson of Galway


    In the early part of 2012 there was a bit of a row going on about the Galway city council's decision to celebrate Che Guevara's roots from the Galway Lynch side of his family. The council voted unanimously to place a memorial to “Che” (nickname for friend or buddy) Guevara near Eyre Square in their city center. Several Irish businessmen as well as two Cuban-American congress members and an Irish-Cuban Yale professor registered their strong discontent that this infamous revolutionary who reportedly was responsible for the execution of thousands of Cubans in the 1959 Castro-led revolution was being honored in this way. And as if that wasn't enough, in the town of Kilkee, Co. Clare (where Che himself once supposedly spent the night), the organizers of a local Che Guevara festival have announced that his daughter, Aleida Guevara, had signed on as one of the speakers at their event to take place in September 2012.

    At the same time an article appeared in the Irish press reporting about a poll that was conducted in the United Kingdom that ranked Michael Collins to be Britain's second greatest enemy behind Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (the Turkish nationalist military leader who defeated the British in the war for Turkish independence). The article said that Collins even outranked Rommel, Napoleon and George Washington (curiously no mention of Hitler). And there was not even a whimper about this in the Irish press. That's probably because they knew that the wind would blow away the memory of this poll in a month's time. But a physical memorial will last longer than a poll, a lot longer. Was the Galway council looking to attract more tourism to their area especially in economically hard times? If so, could they not have found some other less controversial way to promote their area's history and beauty? Of course, but they probably believed that this move would undoubtedly bring in more tourist money in the immediate future. What's not to like about some extra cash in the coming years! Anyway, the monument has yet to be erected and probably never will. 

    So who was Che Guevara? You have seen his caricature on millions of posters, tee-shirts, tattoos and the like, all around the world. The Irish graphic artist, Jim Fitzpatrick, first drew Guevara's figure (see above) in 1967 from a photo entitled “Guerrillero Heroico” (Heroic Guerrilla Fighter) taken by Alberto Korda. It is this depiction of Che that has become one of the most widely disseminated figures in the modern world.

    Family tree on display in the Guevara home in Cordoba, Argentina
    And how was Che Guevara Irish? Che's great grandfather Patrick Lynch, left Ireland for Argentina and settled in Buenos Aires. He married Rosa de Galaya de la Camera, a wealthy heiress and they had a daughter, Che's grandmother, Ana Lynch born in 1851. She married Roberto Guevara Castro, and their eldest son was Ernesto Guevara Lynch, Che's father, who was born in 1900 (the mother was 49 years of age when her eldest son was born???). Ernesto married Celia de la Serna de la Llosa in 1927, and their first child Ernesto, who would be known internationally as “Che”, was born in Rosario, Argentina, in 1928. Young Ernesto Guevara de la Serna Lynch was the eldest of five siblings. His father, always proud of his Irish heritage, once commented regarding his son's temperament that "the first thing to note is that in my son's veins flowed the blood of the Irish rebels."
    Che (left) with parents and siblings
    The Guevara family created an intellectual atmosphere in their home, instilling in young Ernesto a keen interest in literature, science and philosophy. As a youngster he was a voracious reader and excelled in school. In 1948 he entered medical school at the University of Buenos Aires graduating in 1953. His medical studies were interrupted for a year-long motocycle journey through Latin America with his friend Alberto Granado. On the trip he kept notes of their experiences which he later wrote in book form entitled The Motocycle Diaries. In later years it became a New York Times best-seller and was made into a film by the same name in 2004.

    This trip brought the young Guevara and his friend into contact with common people along their route. In Chile they were exposed to the harsh life conditions of workers in the copper mines. In Peru they saw dehumanizing poverty among the peasants of the countryside and in a leper colony along the Amazon River they saw the self-sacrifice and community spirit of those who were outcast from the rest of society. These experiences led Ernesto to analyse the conditions that were imposed by the haves of society that compelled the have-nots to live as they did. He felt that all people had the right to share the earth's resources in such a way that they could all share a more dignified life.

    After he graduated from medical school in 1953, Che decided to go on another trip north to pursue his dream of creating a better world free from the grinding poverty and inhumanity that he had witnessed on his first trip. This journey took him through Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala. In Central America he came into contact with the extensive operations of the United Fruit Company, and saw how they operated by taking control of the land formerly farmed by poor defenseless peasants and was now employing them for sub-human wages and offering no benefits.

    In Guatemala, where democratically elected President Jacobo Arbenz was expropriating uncultivated lands and redistributing then to landless peasants, Guevara liked what he saw and began to settle down. United Fruit owned large tracts of uncultivated land and stood to lose a substantial portion of their wealth from this land reform program. Through United Fruit intervention, Arbenz was utlimately overthrown by the CIA-assisted Guatamalan army. Prior to this, Che's Peruvian economist girlfriend, Hilda Gadea, had introduced him to some Cuban exiles living in Guatemala who were associated with Fidel and Raul Castro. But for the moment his task was to stay out of the clutches of the new government and so he sought refuge in the Argentine embassy until he could obtain safe passage out of the country.

    His next stop was Mexico City where he made direct contact with the Castro brothers who were planning to return to Cuba to overthrow the corrupt regime of dictator Fulgencio Batista. After his Guatemala experience and through long dialogues with Fidel Castro, Che came to a clearer understanding that the struggle to establish the ideals he believed in required even armed conflict. This was the key turning point in Che's life and approach. His encounter with Fidel Castro, according to biographer Simon Reid-Henry, led to a “revolutionary friendship that would change the world.”

    In November 1956, Guevara set out with the Castro brothers and their band of 82 men on the Granma, a small yacht they had purchased to cross from Mexico to Cuba. Shortly after landing, the group was decimated by an attack of Batista's soldiers. Sixty men were killed or captured leaving the rest, including Guevara and the Castro's, to regroup again in the Sierra Maestra mountains.

    On horseback near Santa Clara
    After almost two years in the Cuban mountains skirmishing with Batista's army, Che was gaining the confidence of the locals and recruiting many of them for his forces. He was developing a military prowess that helped gain the upper hand for the revolutionaries. His intuitive ability to overcome the enemy was recognized by Fidel even though he was thought to take some wild chances. His small band of men once stopped a Cuban army battalion of 1500 men by surrounding them and killing many of their soldiers.

    Their campaign had progressed through most of the provinces of the island nation until January 1, 1959 when Batista, recognizing that his end was near, boarded a plane and fled to safety with more than 300 million dollars. The next day Che Guevara and his forces entered Havana and the revolutionary battle was over.

    At first Castro placed Guevara in charge of the purge of former Batista henchmen, including those considered to be traitors, informants and other war criminals. His sense of “revolutionary justice” compelled him to authorize the execution of thousands after conviction by collective trials. He had become a hardened man even before this when he personally executed traitors and spies during his days in the mountains. His essay “Death of a Traitor” in which he tells of how he personally executed Eutimio Guerra, is clear evidence that Che, the man of high ideals who at first struggled to uplift the dignity of the common man, had now become a hardened aggressor. He himself wrote in a letter to his friend, Luis Paredes Lopez, in Buenos Aires: “The executions by firing squads are not only a necessity for the people of Cuba, but also an imposition of the people.” It was here that many reasonable people  who up to this point had admired him, now parted his company. Mob justice held sway.

    At different points in time Che held other important posts in the new revolutionary government. He was the head of the National Institute of Agrarian Reform, the head of the Cuban Literacy Campaign, the Finance Minister, the President of the National Bank, and the head of the Instruction Department of the Revolutionary Armed Forces. It was in this latter capacity that he trained many of the soldiers who repelled the CIA-financed Bay of Pigs invasion in April 1961 that attempted to overturn the Castro revolution. In addition, Castro sent Guevara on several diplomatic missions to the Soviet Union and the Eastern European communist bloc countries seeking aid for the continuance of their revolution.

    With Khrushchev in Moscow
    When the United States discovered the presence of Soviet nuclear war-headed missiles in Cuba in October 1962, a stand-off between President John Kennedy and Premier Nikita Khrushchev ensued. Through negotiations the two parties worked out a behind the scenes agreement in which Russia would withdraw their missiles from Cuba while the US would withdraw its bombers from bases in Turkey. Castro and Guevara had no say in the agreement and felt betrayed by the Soviets. They wanted an armed conflict with the US and not a negotiated settlement. From this point on, while Castro tried to maintain a diplomatic stance vis-a-vis the Soviets because he needed their continued financial assistance, Guevara took every opportunity to attack them openly. This began a rift between the two comrades that only seemed to widen as time passed.

    In 1965 while on another diplomatic mission that took him to several west African countries as well as to Egypt, China and North Korea, Che also stopped off in Ireland and celebrated St. Patrick's Day in Limerick City. He wrote to his father with tongue-in-cheek: “I am in this green Ireland of your ancestors. When they found out, the television came to ask me about the Lynch genealogy, but in case they were horse thieves or something like that, I didn't say much.”

    As a result of this trip, Che was re-directing his attention away from Cuba and becoming more interested in exporting his brand of revolution to other countries. Later that year, with a small band of Cubans, he went to the Congo and collaborated with guerrilla leader Laurent-Desire Kabila. It didn't take long for him to see that Kabila's men were undisciplined and lacked the will to really make the revolution happen. He became disillusioned and saw that his efforts were leading to failure. He summed it up in the words: “we can't liberate by ourselves a country that does not want to fight.”

    Che now felt that he could no longer return to Cuba because he had submitted his written resignation from all his government posts to Fidel Castro and had renounced his Cuban citizenship. Fidel read this letter to a rally in Havana, an act which, in Che's mind, solemnized his separation from Cuba.

    He next turned his attention to South America and to Bolivia in particular. With his band of 50 men Che scored several early successes in his battles against the Bolivian army in early 1967. However he did not know that the US had been tipped off about his new revolutionary effort and was sending CIA special operatives into Bolivia to counteract him. This factor, in addition to his inability to recruit support from the locals in the Vallegrande area, put him at a serious disadvantage. On October 8, 1967, with the intelligence and support of these CIA operatives, Bolivian troops captured Che. He was taken to La Higuera, to a small schoolhouse where he was held until the next day when he was executed by a Bolivian army sargent on the orders of Bolivian President Rene Barriento.

    Che's body was buried in an unmarked common grave where he lay for 30 years. In July 1997 a team of Cuban and Argentine specialists uncovered the grave finding seven bodies. By matching dental records still on file in Cuba they were able to identify the skeletal remains of Che Guevara. Subsequently his remains were moved to a mausoleum in Santa Clara, Cuba where under his command, his forces had dealt the decisive blow to the Batista regime in 1959.

     "He who lives by the sword will die by the sword." 
    Matthew 26:52